The Difference Between a Methodologist and a Terrorist?

...you can’t negotiate with a methodologist.
Needless to say, following a good methodology is an integral part of any respectable software development effort, particularly when you’re working with an offshore team. In fact, most offshore horror stories have less to do with the technical expertise of the developers and more to do with how the project is handled. Many times projects get compromised because the vendor is juggling too many projects at once. Resources are scarce, teams get stretched, deadlines are missed… you know the drill.
Project failures rarely happen at the ‘ones and zeros’ level, so the real trick is to communicate with your team constantly (daily) to make sure expectations are clear and work is being done according to plan. So what you’re paying for is the set of principles that your vendor has established, their culture, their hiring and retention strategies, their growth vision, their industry expertise. The real question becomes, at the moment of truth, are they willing to cut corners and compromise these principles?
Even if they have technical weaknesses, working with principled methodologists who compromise for no one will always lead to success. Companies that define themselves and refuse to compromise will give you the only thing that really matters in business… trust.







Reader Comments (1)
New Yorker had an article this past week on how innovation is more of a process that can be followed than the product of solitary genius arriving at sudden flashes of insight.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/05/12/080512fa_fact_gladwell